|
|
Criminal Law
Divorce/Custody Litigation
Criminal Law, Wire Tapping, Tape Recording, Computer
Security, Tampering of Evidence are criminal issues that do arise on occasion in
the family law context. It occurs because a litigate in a divorce or custody
action in an effort to improve their position or to find the "smoking gun"
overreaches into violations of Texas and Federal penal statutes. This issue has
come up on several occasions in our practice. This article was written to help
the people of Dallas and the State of Texas become aware of and to avoid
criminal penalties arising out of the family law context. Frankly, if you are
charged with violation of a penal statute the concepts of custody, paramours,
and division of property in the divorce context may be your last worry.
Recognize that the defense of a felony indictment may require anywhere from a
$5,000.00 to $15,000.00 retainer for criminal defense counsel.
Texas Penal Code §16.02 - Wiretapping
Client brings into the office tapes of conversations
between his or her spouse and their third-party girlfriend/boyfriend.
Opposing party figured out how to break into clients AOL
account and downloaded e-mails from/to spouse and paramour.
Wire, Oral, or Electronic
Communication
 |
In Texas, can you record a conversation that you are
a party to? Yes. Citizens of other states - beware.
Attorneys beware - ethics opinions. |
 |
Can you record a conversation that you are not a party to?
Not at all. |
Texas Penal Code Section 16.02 provides that a person commits
a criminal offense if he or she intentionally:
-
intercepts an electronic communication
-
endeavors to intercept an electronic communication
-
procures another to either intercept or endeavor to
intercept an electronic communication - neighbor and
friend beware.
-
discloses or endeavors to disclose the contents of a wire,
oral or electronic communication if he or she knows or has reason to believe
that the information was obtained by an interception
-
uses or endeavors to use the contents of a wire, oral or
electronic communication if he or she was reckless about whether the
communication was obtained by an interception in violation of this statute -
attorney beware.
-
knowingly or intentionally effects a covert entry for the
purpose of interception. In other words, don't think
about going into what is termed "your home" that your spouse has exclusive use
of by Temporary Order to plant video cameras and radio transmission devices.
Zealot beware.
-
uses, endeavors to use or procure another to use any
electronic, mechanical or other device to intercept any oral communication
when the device is affixed to or transmits a signal through a wire or
transmits or interferes with the transmission by radio.
-
CONVICTION: A conviction under §16.02 of the Texas Penal
Code subjects the offender to confinement in the Institutional Division of the
Texas Department of Criminal Justice for not less than 2 years nor more than
20 years and a fine of up to $10,000.00, or both.
 |
"Darlie, I'm a good girl."
|
 |
"Guido, I have a new issue of playboy and some
cigarettes." |
In reality, you may avoid prison but a felony conviction will
remain on your record for life. In the end, a criminal charge and conviction of
violating §16.02 means: you don't care about custody anymore and you don't care
about elections - you don't vote.
Note, §16.02 does not concern itself with the actual
interception of a communication. It includes an attempt
to make the interception. This is one provision of the Texas Penal Code that
that incorporates an attempt into the offense. Usually, an attempt is a lesser
included offense with regards to other Penal Code provisions.
Wiretapping: Spouses Occupy the Same House
In Simpson v. Simpson, 490 F.2d 803, the 5th circuit
(our federal court of appeals in New Orleans) carved out an exception to the
federal version of the Texas Wiretapping statute for spouses occupying the same
residence. Several circuit courts have declined to follow Simpson, Texas
courts have criticized Simpson - Collins v. Collins, 904 S.W.2d
792 and Turner v. PV Int'l Corp., 765 S.W.2d 455. Since the marital
domicile exception does not seem to exist in Texas either by statute or by case
law, the safe practice is - Don't do it.
Texas Penal Code §33.09
Breach of Computer Security
Breach of Computer Security is about preventing the
destruction of electronically stored data, and protecting the privacy of
computer information both at home and the workplace. Penal Code section 33.09
provides: "A person commits an offense if the person knowingly accesses a
computer, computer network, or computer system without the effective consent of
the owner.
The owner is not necessarily the person in whose name the
computer is titled to. Section 33.01(15) defines "Owner" as a person who "has
title to the property, possession of the property, whether lawful or not, or a
greater right to possession of the property than the actor.
A computer system is any combination of a computer or
computer software, or physical facilities supporting the computer or computer
network. This broad definition would seem to encompass almost any PC or network
configuration - AOL, MSN, Netscape, are all computer network systems. Your
laptop is part of the network if it has one of the access providers on it, or is
configured to your office network system.
Examples:
 |
Spouse is ordered
out of the house through temporary orders. Spouse's personal PC remains on the
premises. Spouse returns the child after visitation one evening while other
spouse is not at home. Spouse enters home while the cat's away and opens up
downloaded e-mail. Spouse has breached computer security. Why? Because even
though spouse is the title holder to the property, other spouse has a superior
right of possession and is thus the owner pursuant to Section 33.01(15). |
 |
Spouse "figures
out" American Express account password. She opens opens hubby's Amex account
through her work PC. She is in violation of Penal Code Section 33.02.
|
Breach of Computer
Security is a Class B misdemeanor which provides for confinement in jail for up
to 180 days and a fine of $2,000 or both unless damage or deletion of data,
harm, fraud or a benefit to another occurs, in which case the punishment is
increased according to the dollar value of the amount involved. Punishment could
be a 1st degree felony which carries a 5-99 years or life in prison and a
$10,000.00 fine.
|
|